MediaDex
by MediaDex
User Reviews / Comments
This is a collection of unbiased & balanced reviews of MediaDex
Review Rating | Date | Link | Review | Was This Review Useful? |
     [2] |
2010-05-18 |
|
MediaDex 2.0.2.0.0:
Pros:Good features
Cons:Very pooly suppoirted. Bugs. Started using Canto Cumulus years ago. They spun off single-user to MediaDex a few years ago and now MediaDex no longer supports it and you have to buy a $200 upgrade back to Canto Cumulus. 2.0.2.0.0 has bugs (e.g., batch reference changing) and no way to get a fix without upgrading. MediaDex forum is down (link generates an error). Company appears defunct. Product stores meta data in proprietary format, not in IPTC, EXIF or XMP. Stay away. |
|
     [3] |
2007-11-01 |
|
MediaDex 2.0 pro:
Pros:uses well reputed cumulus image database library.
countless import plugins.
many adjustable features.
Cons:rather buggy frontend software.
very complicated preferences.
every little error (and they are many) crashes the entire application, including opened catalogs.
is there any error handling implemented at all ?
selecting many thumbnails (6000) is nearly impossible as in aged cumulus. no improvements here.
we reverted to cumulus singleuser on mac os classic for now !! |
|
| [Unrated] |
2007-08-02 |
|
MediaDex Pro:
Pros:Easy to use, good organization, keywording, and retrieval capabilities.
Cons:Trouble opening catalogs, exporting, and frequent crashing on new Macs. No working "save as" function. IT support erratic, tending to ignore problems they cannot answer or fix. |
|
     [2] |
2007-05-27 |
|
MediaDex Pros: Used it for years. We have most of our photos and illustrations on CDs and DVDs. I can find out which disk a particular image is on after clicking the thumbnail. Cons: Tends to crash a bit on the new IMacs (system 10.4) |
|
Reader's Comments:
Please leave your comments or suggestions below!